Published 2025-08-31
Keywords
- VAT,
- tax incentives,
- compensation mechanisms
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2025 Butayev O`tkir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This study examines the role of VAT compensation and subsidy mechanisms in promoting the formalization of businesses, enhancing transparency, and reducing shadow economic activity. Drawing on international experiences from countries including South Korea, the Netherlands, Poland, Italy, Mexico, Germany, and France, the analysis demonstrates that linking VAT incentives to compliance requirements, electronic accounting, and proper registration effectively encourages businesses to operate legally. The evidence shows that such mechanisms not only improve fiscal efficiency but also strengthen tax discipline and governance in sectors of high social and economic significance. The findings suggest that targeted VAT reforms, combined with digital reporting, licensing, and continuous oversight, provide a practical tool for both increasing government revenue and reducing the informal economy.
References
- Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do ethics matter? Tax compliance and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0843-5
- Bird, R. (2015). Improving tax administration in developing countries. International Tax and Public Finance, 22(6), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-015-9374-0
- Bird, R., & Zolt, E. M. (2014). Taxation and development: The weak links. In J. Alm & J. Martinez-Vazquez (Eds.), Public finance in developing and transitional countries (pp. 69–102). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- European Commission. (2020). VAT e-invoicing: Overview and best practices. https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/vat_en
- IMF. (2021). Uzbekistan: Fiscal transparency evaluation and tax administration modernization. International Monetary Fund.
- Keen, M. (2013). The anatomy of the VAT. National Tax Journal, 66(2), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2013.2.06
- OECD. (2019). Tax administration 2019: Comparative information on OECD and other countries. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264319187-en
- OECD. (2021). Revenue administration in Uzbekistan: Lessons from international experience. OECD Publishing.
- Slemrod, J., & Bakija, J. (2017). Taxing ourselves: A citizen’s guide to the debate over taxes (5th ed.). MIT Press.
- World Bank. (2020). Uzbekistan: Strengthening tax compliance through digitalization and risk management. World Bank Group.
- Australian Taxation Office. (2023). Shadow economy. https://www.ato.gov.au/api/public/content/0-a7987b60-b0d5-469d-9eb8-05cf397fa9f2
- Kwon, S. (2011). Health Care Reform in Korea: Key. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2011/healthcare/pdfs/s3_kwon.pdf
- OECD. (2015). Innovation, Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability in the Netherlands.
- World Bank. (2018). Tax compliance is the cornerstone of safety nets: Lessons from Poland.
- URL:https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/europeandcentralasia/tax-compliance-cornerstone-safety-nets-lessons-poland
- OECD. (2023). Italy 2023 Energy Policy Review. URL: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/71b328b3-3e5b-4c04-8a22-3ead575b3a9a/Italy_2023_EnergyPolicyReview.pdf
- OECD. (2022). OECD Economic Surveys: Mexico 2022.
- URL:https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/02/oecd-economic-surveys-mexico-2022_a2937d37/2e1de26c-en.pdf