Vol. 5 No. 07 (2025)
Articles

Reinforcement Learning–Driven Autonomous Cyber Defence: Trust, Robustness, and Governance in Complex and Adversarial Software Ecosystems

Dr. Alexander J. Whitcombe
Department of Computer Science and Security Studies University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Published 2025-07-31

Keywords

  • Autonomous Cyber Defence,
  • Reinforcement Learning,
  • AI Governance,
  • Explainable AI

How to Cite

Dr. Alexander J. Whitcombe. (2025). Reinforcement Learning–Driven Autonomous Cyber Defence: Trust, Robustness, and Governance in Complex and Adversarial Software Ecosystems. Stanford Database Library of American Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 5(07), 99–103. Retrieved from https://oscarpubhouse.com/index.php/sdlajast/article/view/66

Abstract

The accelerating complexity, scale, and adversarial sophistication of modern digital infrastructures have rendered traditional human-centric cyber defence models increasingly insufficient. This challenge is compounded by a persistent global cybersecurity workforce gap and the rapid emergence of autonomous attack vectors that evolve faster than conventional defensive cycles. Against this backdrop, artificial intelligence—particularly reinforcement learning—has emerged as a promising paradigm for enabling autonomous, adaptive, and proactive cyber defence capabilities. This research article presents an extensive theoretical and analytical examination of autonomous cyber defence systems grounded in reinforcement learning, stochastic games, moving target defence, and explainable artificial intelligence, with particular emphasis on defence governance, trust, robustness, and operational viability. Drawing strictly upon the provided scholarly and governmental literature, the study synthesizes advances in deep reinforcement learning, adversarial learning, autonomous network defence, and AI governance frameworks across defence and civilian domains. The article elaborates on methodological paradigms for deploying autonomous defensive agents, explores empirical and conceptual findings reported in prior work, and critically evaluates systemic limitations such as robustness-accuracy trade-offs, backdoor vulnerabilities, explainability deficits, and ethical governance constraints. The results highlight that while autonomous cyber defence systems demonstrate significant potential for mitigating zero-day threats, malware propagation, and adaptive adversaries, their effectiveness depends heavily on architectural transparency, policy alignment, human oversight, and resilience to adversarial manipulation. The discussion advances a nuanced perspective on future research directions, emphasizing the integration of explainable reinforcement learning, secure training pipelines, and international governance alignment. Ultimately, this article contributes a comprehensive, publication-ready synthesis that advances academic understanding of autonomous cyber defence as both a technical and socio-technical system.

References

  1. Crumpler, W., & Lewis, J. A. (2022). Cybersecurity workforce gap. JSTOR.
  2. Cui, J., Han, Y., Ma, Y., Jiao, J., & Zhang, J. (2024). BadRL: Sparse targeted backdoor attack against reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38, 11687–11694.
  3. Dazeley, R., Vamplew, P., & Cruz, F. (2023). Explainable reinforcement learning for broad-xai: A conceptual framework and survey. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(23), 16893–16916.
  4. National Defence. (2021). Autonomous systems for defence and security: Trust barriers to adoption. Government of Canada.
  5. Devitt, S. K., & Copeland, D. (2023). Australia’s approach to AI governance in security and defence. In The AI Wave in Defence Innovation (pp. 217–250). Routledge.
  6. Dhir, N., Hoeltgebaum, H., Adams, N., Briers, M., Burke, A., & Jones, P. (2021). Prospective artificial intelligence approaches for active cyber defence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09981.
  7. Dondo, M., & Nakhla, N. (2021). Towards a framework for autonomous defensive cyber operations in a network operations centre.
  8. Eghtesad, T., Vorobeychik, Y., & Laszka, A. (2020). Adversarial deep reinforcement learning based adaptive moving target defense. Decision and Game Theory for Security.
  9. Eskridge, T. C., Carvalho, M. M., Stoner, E., Toggweiler, T., & Granados, A. (2015). VINE: A cyber emulation environment for MTD experimentation.
  10. Fang, Z., Wang, J., Li, B., Wu, S., Zhou, Y., & Huang, H. (2019). Evading anti-malware engines with deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Access, 7, 48867–48879.
  11. Foley, M., Hicks, C., Highnam, K., & Mavroudis, V. (2022). Autonomous network defence using reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security.
  12. Frankish, K., & Ramsey, W. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Hasselt, H. V., Guez, A., & Silver, D. (2016). Deep reinforcement learning with double Q-learning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 30.
  14. Kiely, M., Bowman, D., Standen, M., & Moir, C. (2023). On autonomous agents in a cyber defence environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07388.
  15. Lagoudakis, M., & Parr, R. (2012). Value function approximation in zero-sum Markov games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.0580.
  16. Li, T., & Hankin, C. (2017). Effective defence against zero-day exploits using Bayesian networks. Critical Information Infrastructures Security.
  17. Liu, X., Zhang, H., Dong, S., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Network defense decision-making based on a stochastic game system and a deep recurrent Q-network. Computers & Security, 111, 102480.
  18. Making AI work for cyber defense: The accuracy-robustness tradeoff. (2021).
  19. Schaul, T., Quan, J., Antonoglou, I., & Silver, D. (2015). Prioritized experience replay.
  20. Shen, Y., Shepherd, C., Ahmed, C. M., Yu, S., & Li, T. (2024). Comparative DQN-improved algorithms for stochastic games-based automated edge intelligence-enabled IoT malware spread-suppression strategies. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 11(12), 22550–22561.
  21. Shukla, O. (2025). Autonomous cyber defence in complex software ecosystems: A graph-based and AI-driven approach to zero-day threat mitigation. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovation Management, 1(01), 01–10.