Stanford Database Library of American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025)
Articles

SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS, MODELING APPROACHES, AND PRACTICAL PATHWAYS TOWARD LOW-WASTE, RESILIENT NETWORKS

PDF
  • Dr. Amina R. Delgado
Dr. Amina R. Delgado
Global Institute for Supply Chain Sustainability, University of Lisbon

Published 2025-11-30

Keywords

  • sustainable supply chain management,
  • quantitative models,
  • governance,
  • social sustainability,
  • transparency,
  • resilience
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Dr. Amina R. Delgado. (2025). SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS, MODELING APPROACHES, AND PRACTICAL PATHWAYS TOWARD LOW-WASTE, RESILIENT NETWORKS. Stanford Database Library of American Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 5(11), 265–272. Retrieved from https://oscarpubhouse.com/index.php/sdlajast/article/view/52

Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Amina R. Delgado

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Background: Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) has matured from normative prescriptions to an interdisciplinary field that blends ethics, operations research, risk management, and market mechanisms. Foundational work established definitional boundaries and conceptual frameworks; subsequent quantitative modeling and empirical studies have advanced our ability to design, manage, and evaluate supply chains that account for economic, environmental, and social dimensions (Linton et al., 2007; Seuring & Müller, 2008; Carter & Rogers, 2008). Despite progress, persistent gaps remain in integrating heterogeneous theoretical perspectives, operationalizing social criteria, and aligning market incentives with system-level sustainability objectives (Touboulic & Walker, 2015; Seuring & Müller, 2008).

 Objective: This article synthesizes extant theoretical foundations and modeling approaches for SSCM, proposes an integrated conceptual architecture for designing and evaluating sustainable supply chains, and articulates prescriptive insights for managers and policy makers. The work strictly draws on the provided reference corpus and elaborates theoretical implications, counter-arguments, and future research directions.

 Methods: A structured interpretive synthesis of seminal and contemporary works was performed: conceptual frameworks (Seuring & Müller, 2008; Carter & Rogers, 2008), structured literature reviews (Touboulic & Walker, 2015; Seuring, 2012), and quantitative model surveys (Brandenburg et al., 2014). The methodology section describes how theory integration, taxonomy construction, and model selection heuristics are derived from these sources and used to generate normative guidance.

 Results: The synthesis identifies three organizing logics for SSCM: (1) normative-ethical logic emphasizing social responsibility and legitimacy (Anner, 2012; Buchanan, 2000); (2) market-incentive logic focusing on the role of demand, regulation, and transparency (Vermeulen & Seuring, 2009; Chowdhury, 2025); and (3) analytic-technical logic emphasizing modeling, optimization, and measurement (Seuring, 2012; Brandenburg et al., 2014). From this, an integrated architecture is proposed that brings together governance mechanisms, metric systems, quantitative models, and digital enablers. Practical recommendations center on robust decision rules, layered metrics, and stakeholder-aligned governance.

 Conclusions: Progress in SSCM requires co-evolution of theory and application: richer social metrics, hybrid quantitative methods, and market structures that internalize externalities. The article concludes with a research agenda and policy recommendations that prioritize measurement, transparency, and resilience while acknowledging trade-offs and limitations.

PDF

References

  1. Linton, J.D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1075–1082.
  2. Vermeulen, W.J.V., & Seuring, S. (2009). Sustainability through the market — the impact of sustainable supply chain management: Introduction. Sustainable Development, 17, 269–273.
  3. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1699–1710.
  4. Carter, C.R., & Rogers, D.S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving towards new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.
  5. Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015). Theories in sustainable supply chain management: A structured literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(1/2), 16–42.
  6. Seuring, S. (2012). A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management.
  7. Brandenburg, M., Govindan, K., Sarkis, J., & Seuring, S. (2014). Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 233, 299–312.
  8. Chowdhury, W. A. (2025). Blockchain for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Reducing Waste Through Transparent Resource Tracking. Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 4(2), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.58425/jpscm.v4i2.435
  9. Akindote, O.J., Adegbite, A.O., Omotosho, A., Anyanwu, A., & Maduka, C.P. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of IT project management in healthcare digitalization: A review. International Medical Science Research Journal, 4(1), 37–50.
  10. Anner, M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and freedom of association rights: The precarious quest for legitimacy and control in global supply chains. Politics & Society, 40(4), 609–644.
  11. Atadoga, A., Osasona, F., Amoo, O.O., Farayola, O.A., Ayinla, B.S., & Abrahams, T.O. (2024). The role of IT in enhancing supply chain resilience: A global review. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(2), 336–351.
  12. Benjaafar, S., Li, Y., & Daskin, M. (2012). Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10(1), 99–116.
  13. Buchanan, D.R. (2000). An Ethic for Health Promotion: Rethinking the Sources of Human Wellbeing. Oxford University Press.
  14. Buldeo Rai, H., Verlinde, S., Merckx, J., & Macharis, C. (2017). Crowd logistics: An opportunity for more sustainable urban freight transport?. European Transport Research Review, 9, 1–13.
  15. Carter, R., & Easton, P.L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 46–62.
  16. Paul, S.K., & Sarker, R. (2017). A quantitative model for disruption mitigation in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 257, 881–895.
  17. Mota, B., Gomes, M.I., Carvalho, A., & Barbosa-Povoa, A.P. (2015). Towards supply chain sustainability: Economic, environmental and social design and planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 14–27.
  18. Giannakis, M., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 455–470.
  19. Munny, A.A., Ali, S.M., Kabir, G., Moktadir, M.A., Rahman, T., & Mahtab, Z. (2019). Enablers of social sustainability in the supply chain: An example of footwear industry from an emerging economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 230–242.
  20. Green, K.W., Zelbst, P.J., Meacham, J., & Bhadauria, V.S. (2012). Green supply chain management practices: Impact on performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 290–305.
  21. de Vries, G.J., & Ferrarini, B. (2017). What Accounts for the Growth of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Advanced and Emerging Economies? The Role of Consumption, Technology and Global Supply Chain Participation. Ecological Economics, 132, 213–223.
  22. Wittstruck, D., & Teuteberg, F. (2012). Understanding the success factors of sustainable supply chain management: Empirical evidence from the electrics and electronics industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, 141–158.
  23. Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329–341.
  24. Alvarez-Rodriguez, C., Martin-Gamboa, M., & Iribarren, D. (2020). Sustainability-oriented efficiency of retail supply chains: A combination of life cycle assessment and dynamic network data envelopment analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 705, 135977.
  25. Alwadani, R., & Ndubisi, N.O. (2021). Family business goal, sustainable supply chain management, and platform economy: A theory-based review & propositions for future research. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. doi:10.1080/13675567.2021.1944069.
  26. Bandi, C., Han, E., & Nohadani, O. (2019). Sustainable inventory with robust periodic-affine policies and application to medical supply chains. Management Science, 65(10), 4636–4655.
  27. Giannakis, M., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 455–470.
  28. Wittstruck, D., & Teuteberg, F. (2012). Understanding the success factors of sustainable supply chain management: Empirical evidence from the electrics and electronics industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, 141–158.
  29. Carter, C., & Easton, P.L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41, 46–59.
  30. Benjaafar, S., Li, Y., & Daskin, M. (2012). Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10(1), 99–116.
  31. Buchanan, D.R. (2000). An Ethic for Health Promotion: Rethinking the Sources of Human Wellbeing. Oxford University Press.
  32. Buldeo Rai, H., Verlinde, S., Merckx, J., & Macharis, C. (2017). Crowd logistics: An opportunity for more sustainable urban freight transport?. European Transport Research Review, 9, 1–13.