Stanford Database Library of American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

Vol. 5 No. 08 (2025): Volume 05 Issue 08
Articles

FPGA Acceleration for Security and Performance in Multi-Tenant Clouds with Hardware-Assured IP Protection

pdf
  • Dr. Alexander M. Reynolds
Dr. Alexander M. Reynolds
Department of Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia

Published 2025-08-31

Keywords

  • FPGA acceleration,
  • cloud security,
  • multi-tenant environments,
  • hardware IP protection

How to Cite

Dr. Alexander M. Reynolds. (2025). FPGA Acceleration for Security and Performance in Multi-Tenant Clouds with Hardware-Assured IP Protection. Stanford Database Library of American Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 5(08), 100–104. Retrieved from https://oscarpubhouse.com/index.php/sdlajast/article/view/47

Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Alexander M. Reynolds

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of cloud computing services has necessitated an urgent focus on ensuring both performance efficiency and robust security in multi-tenant environments. In particular, the adoption of Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) in cloud infrastructures presents a promising avenue for accelerating computation-intensive workloads while simultaneously addressing critical security concerns associated with untrusted intellectual property (IP) cores. This study synthesizes contemporary research in FPGA-enabled cloud architectures, zero-trust frameworks for multi-tenant platforms, and hardware protection techniques for system-on-chip (SoC) designs to establish a cohesive perspective on securing cloud acceleration. We explore obfuscation strategies, statistical hardware Trojan detection, and voltage-based attack mitigation in FPGA environments. The research further examines encryption methodologies, including hybrid and elliptic curve-based algorithms, tailored to preserving data privacy in shared cloud infrastructures. By integrating hardware-centric security measures with advanced cryptographic techniques and cloud-native acceleration strategies, the paper proposes a multi-layered paradigm for enhancing resilience, performance, and trustworthiness in next-generation cloud services. The findings elucidate theoretical and practical implications, highlighting both the opportunities for deploying FPGAs at scale in public clouds and the complex security challenges that arise from multi-tenancy, shared resources, and potentially untrusted hardware modules. The study concludes by outlining future research trajectories, emphasizing adaptive security frameworks, dynamic resource isolation, and cross-layer verification methodologies as essential components of secure cloud acceleration.

pdf

References

  1. Abhishek Basak, Swarup Bhunia, Thomas Tkacik, and Sandip Ray. 2017. Security assurance for system-on-chip designs with untrusted IPs. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 12, 7 (July 2017), 1515–1528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2017.2658544
  2. Hariharan, R. 2025. Zero trust security in multi-tenant cloud environments. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10.
  3. Christophe Bobda, Joel Mandebi Mbongue, Paul Chow, Mohammad Ewais, Naif Tarafdar, Juan Camilo Vega, Ken Eguro, Dirk Koch, Suranga Handagala, Miriam Leeser, et al. 2022. The future of FPGA acceleration in datacenters and the cloud. ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems 15, 3 (2 2022), 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3506713
  4. Andrew Boutros, Mathew Hall, Nicolas Papernot, and Vaughn Betz. 2020. Neighbors from hell: Voltage attacks against deep learning accelerators on multi-tenant FPGAs. In 2020 Proceedings of the International Conference of Field-Programmable Technology (ICFPT), 103–111.
  5. Stuart Byma, J. Gregory Steffan, Hadi Bannazadeh, Alberto Leon-Garcia, and Paul Chow. 2014. FPGAs in the cloud: Booting virtualized hardware accelerators with OpenStack. In Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines (FCCM ’14), 109–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FCCM.2014.42
  6. Adrian M. Caulfield, Eric S. Chung, Andrew Putnam, Hari Angepat, Jeremy Fowers, Michael Haselman, Stephen Heil, Matt Humphrey, Puneet Kaur, Joo-Young Kim, et al. 2016. A cloud-scale acceleration architecture. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO ’16), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MICRO.2016.7783710
  7. Rajat Subhra Chakraborty and Swarup Bhunia. 2009. HARPOON: An obfuscation-based SoC design methodology for hardware protection. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 28, 10 (2009), 1493–1502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2009.2028166
  8. Rajat Subhra Chakraborty, Francis Wolff, Somnath Paul, Christos Papachristou, and Swarup Bhunia. 2009. MERO: A statistical approach for hardware Trojan detection. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop Lausanne on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems (CHES ’09). Springer, 396–410.
  9. Roy Chapman and Tariq S. Durrani. 2000. IP protection of DSP algorithms for system on chip implementation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 48, 3 (2000), 854–861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/78.824679
  10. Fei Chen, Yi Shan, Yu Zhang, Yu Wang, Hubertus Franke, Xiaotao Chang, and Kun Wang. 2014. Enabling FPGAs in the cloud. In CF ’14: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Computing Frontiers, Article 3, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2597917.2597929
  11. Derek Chiou. 2017. The Microsoft catapult project. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC ’17), 124–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IISWC.2017.8167769
  12. Goyal, V., Kant, C. 2018. An effective hybrid encryption algorithm for ensuring cloud data security. Big Data Analytics, Singapore, pp. 195–210
  13. Kanna, G.P., Vasudevan, V. 2019. A fully homomorphic–elliptic curve cryptography based encryption algorithm for ensuring the privacy preservation of the cloud data. Cluster Comput., 22(4), pp. 9561–9569
  14. Subramanian, E.K., Tamilselvan, L. 2020. Elliptic curve Diffie–Hellman cryptosystem in big data cloud security. Cluster Comput., pp. 1–11
  15. Alowolodu, O.D., Alese, B.K., Adetunmbi, A.O., et al. 2013. Elliptic curve cryptography for securing cloud computing applications. Int. J. Comput. Appl., 66(23), pp. 10–17
  16. Wang, G-G. 2018. Moth search algorithm: a bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization problems. Memetic Comput., 10(2), pp. 151–164
  17. Bh, P., Chandravathi, D., Roja, P.P. 2010. Encoding and decoding of a message in the implementation of elliptic curve cryptography using Koblitz's method. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng., 2(5), pp. 1904–1907
  18. Shilpa, Lalitha, Prakash, A., & Rao, S. 2009. BFHI in a tertiary care hospital: Does being Baby friendly affect lactation success? The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 76, 655–657
  19. Singh, V. K., Mishra, A., Gupta, K. K., Misra, R., & Patel, M. L. 2015. Reduction of microalbuminuria in type-2 diabetes mellitus with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor alone and with cilnidipine. Indian Journal of Nephrology, 25(6), 334–339
  20. Gopinath, S., Giambarberi, L., Patil, S., & Chamberlain, R. S. 2016. Characteristics and survival of patients with eccrine carcinoma: a cohort study. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 75(1), 215–217
  21. Lin, L. I., & Hao, L. I. 2024. The efficacy of niraparib in pediatric recurrent PFA⁃ type ependymoma. Chinese Journal