Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025)
Articles

Lightweight and High-Performance Encryption for Real-Time Multimedia and Embedded Systems: Theory, Implementation Considerations, and Comparative Analysis

John R. Anderson
Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh

Published 2025-11-30

Keywords

  • lightweight encryption,
  • real-time video,
  • AES/Rijndael,
  • FPGA implementation

How to Cite

John R. Anderson. (2025). Lightweight and High-Performance Encryption for Real-Time Multimedia and Embedded Systems: Theory, Implementation Considerations, and Comparative Analysis. Stanford Database Library of American Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 5(11), 215–222. Retrieved from https://oscarpubhouse.com/index.php/sdlajast/article/view/38

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive, publication-ready examination of lightweight and high-performance encryption strategies for real-time multimedia transmission and constrained embedded systems. Beginning with an expansive theoretical framing of the unique security requirements of streaming video, voice, and sensor data, the work synthesizes decades of prior engineering practice and academic study to articulate clear design objectives for encryption schemes in latency-sensitive environments (Aly, 2004; Shi, Changgui & Wang, 2004). We review the cryptographic primitives most relevant to such contexts—symmetric block ciphers and stream ciphers—and discuss implementation trade-offs across software, hardware (FPGA), and mobile environments (Atul et al., 2011; Hoang & Nguyen, 2012; Rouaf & Yousif, 2021). Performance metrics are examined in depth: throughput, latency, computational overhead, memory footprint, energy consumption, and compatibility with compression pipelines (Andriani, Wijayanti & Wibowo, 2018; Advani & Gonsai, 2019). Building on standards and canonical references for AES/Rijndael and guidance on governmental cryptographic deployment (Daemen & Rijmen, 2009; Daemen & Rijmen, 2010; Lee, 2009), we analyze specific MPEG video encryption approaches and lightweight real-time variants with respect to security, perceptual impact, and computational cost (Shi, Changgui & Wang, 2004; Aly, 2004). Case studies and hypotheticals address FPGA acceleration, embedded secure modules for sensor streams, and voice-over-IP protections, drawing on practical implementations and comparative performance evaluations (Atul et al., 2011; Chalermwat et al., 2011; Bassil et al., 2005). Limitations, attack surfaces, and countermeasures—covering chosen-plaintext vulnerabilities, key-management issues, and side-channel leakage—are elaborated with citations to standards, analysis pages, and implementation reports (Cole et al., 2005; Gladman, 2012; CSOR/NIST). The article closes with concrete recommendations for architects of real-time secure transmission systems: when to prefer lightweight cipher variants, how to partition cryptographic tasks between hardware and software, and how to integrate encryption with compression to maintain both confidentiality and streaming performance (Aly, 2004; Shi, Changgui & Wang, 2004; Andriani et al., 2018). This synthesis is intended to guide implementers and researchers toward designs that balance robust security with the demanding performance constraints of modern multimedia and embedded deployments.

References

  1. Salah Aly. “A Light-Weight Encrypting For Real Time Video Transmission”, TR04-002, College of computing and digital media, Depaul University, August 2004. http://facweb.cs.depaul.edu/research/TechReports/TR04-002.pdf
  2. B. Shi, W. Changgui and S. Wang. “MPEG Video Encryption Algorithms”, Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 24, Issue 1, pp. 57–79, September 2004.
  3. N. A. Advani and A. M. Gonsai. "Performance Analysis of Symmetric Encryption Algorithms for their Encryption and Decryption Time," 2019 6th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), 2019, pp. 359–362.
  4. M. T. Rouaf and A. Yousif. "Performance Evaluation of Encryption Algorithms in Mobile Devices," 2020 International Conference on Computer, Control, Electrical, and Electronics Engineering (ICCCEEE), 2021, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICCCEEE49695.2021.9429673.
  5. Andriani, S. E. Wijayanti and F. W. Wibowo. "Comparison Of AES 128, 192 And 256 Bit Algorithm For Encryption And Description File," 2018 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Information System and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE), 2018, pp. 120–124. doi: 10.1109/ICITISEE.2018.8720983.
  6. Atul, M., et al. (2011). “FPGA Implementation of AES Algorithm”, International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology (ICECT), pp. 401–405.
  7. Bassil, C., et al. (2005). “Critical voice network security analysis and new approach for securing Voice over IP Communications”, SETIT 2005, 3rd International Conference: Sciences of Electronic, Technologies of information and Telecommunications, Tunisia.
  8. T. Chalermwat, et al. (2011). "FPGA Implementation of FOEPortable hard disk System”, The International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Embedded Systems, Pattaya, Thailand.
  9. Eric Cole, et al. (2005). Network Security Bible, Wiley Publishing Inc, 2005.
  10. Computer Security Objects Register (CSOR), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). http://csrc.nist.gov/csor/
  11. Daemen, J. and Rijmen, V. (2009). AES Proposal: Rijndael, AES Algorithm Submission. Available at http://www.nist.gov/CryptoToolkit
  12. Daemen, J. and Rijmen, V. (2010). The block cipher Rijndael, Smart Card Research and Applications, LNCS 1820, Springer-Verlag, pp. 288–296.
  13. Gladman, B. (2012). AES related home page. http://fp.gladman.plus.com/cryptography_technology/
  14. Hoang, T. and Nguyen, V. (2012). An efficient FPGA implementation of the Advanced Encryption Standard Algorithm. IEEE 978-1-4673-0309-5/12.
  15. Lee. (2009). NIST Special Publication 800-21, Guideline for Implementing Cryptography in the Federal Government, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  16. Patil, A. A., & Deshpande, S. (2025). Real-time encryption and secure communication for sensor data in autonomous systems. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(415), 41–55. https://www.jisem-journal.com.